LUFCTALK

The Ruling by the governing body has stated that levels of testosterone is a triumph for fair play in womens athletics'.
Its unfortunate that Caster falls within questionable boundaries. If we allow unlimited checks on Womens athletics that whole
sport comes into question. Its clear that Caster does have an advantage, just look at her build compared to the rest of the female runners.
Lets make it clear its not her fault but unfortunately she is a one off that has to be restricted to safe guard the sport of womens athletics. I congratulate
the IAAF for having the guts to do whats right even though the Caster fans are livid..

cybermaf wrote:The Ruling by the governing body has stated that levels of testosterone is a triumph for fair play in womens athletics'.
Its unfortunate that Caster falls within questionable boundaries. If we allow unlimited checks on Womens athletics that whole
sport comes into question. Its clear that Caster does have an advantage, just look at her build compared to the rest of the female runners.
Lets make it clear its not her fault but unfortunately she is a one off that has to be restricted to safe guard the sport of womens athletics. I congratulate
the IAAF for having the guts to do whats right even though the Caster fans are livid..

I'm surprised no one tried to ban the Williams Sisters from Tennis, what with them being so big and strong? I juts hope the compensate CS for loss of earnings. The old East German athletes and Fatima Whitbread would be quaking in their Spikes.