Shadwell White wrote:I don't want to here about another five year plan without any explanation to what it is, I've heard it all before. Every successful team is paying over the odds for players, that's the game we're in and it's not going to change anytime soon.
I don't buy into that theory at all. Was £400k for Riyad Mahrez paying over the odds? What about £2m for Michu? (Granted, injuries ruined him in the end). We even have our own little gem in Saíz at £3m - was he over the odds?
Huddersfield went up last year and didn't sign a single player over £2m (Yes, Mooy was expensive, but they signed him permanently after winning promotion).
This season, Cardiff have barely spent £5m and they're right up there. Sheffield United have hardly spent a fortune, and bar one £5m striker who barely plays, Bristol City haven't spent much either. Teams like Preston and Brentford aren't far off the play offs with relatively small expenditure and wage bills, too.
Not every successful team is paying over the odds for players. Even Man City are refusing to get involved in the Sanchez conundrum because they think £35m for a player they could sign for free is six months (along with his quite ridiculous wage demands) is patently absurd, and they could quite easily afford to pay ten times the fee and quadruple his wages! It's about getting value for money. We're not a Man City, Barcelona, or a Real Madrid. We're not even a Wolves. We can't afford to spend £16m on players and pay them Premiership wages, because we have an owner who isn't stupid enough to risk it all on one season. Wolves did, and it's working for them - congratulations to them. It's not really worked for Middlesbrough though, has it? Didn't work for Villa last year, either. And don't get me started on Birmingham - how much did Harry Redknapp spend?!