I know I called for Sam to be rested in Capital One and FA Cup games (as did others - although more seem to be claiming it now

), along with some league games but you look at it from manager / player view: a lot of fans had given up on Warnock by January; by then Pelts had shown, lets say, fallibility and Sam was playing out of his skin. What would 99% of fans have said / done if Byram had been rested by NW? The lad would have made it clear he was fit and raring to go so the under-fire manager would be trying to explain leaving out the child-prodigy. Never going to go well.
Then take into account that a fantastic scout didn't see a problem with the lad right up until the warm-up of the Brighton game when Sam said he didn't feel right; nothing before that we hear, nada. In hindsight, yes, I'm sure BMc would have rested him before but it's one of those things that can't be predicted; we all assume its because he played so many matches but I ruptured my ankle to a point where consultant said it would have been better if I'd broken it by stepping off a kerb, number 2s happens; Sam could have slept funny or twisted getting out of a car, we just don't know.
So lets leave off the hindsight-fuelled "shouldn't have played him"; I cited the Gerrard thing as a kid which was being over-played and its possible that Sam's first long season at this level has caused a problem but hindsight isn't helping the lad now; he trained two days this week and was "sore" - whatever the cause of problem, taking it easy and not playing over the summer clearly hasn't solved it so all we can do is hope that he gets the treatment he needs to get back playing - and that we don't end up regretting not taking £8m for someone who, after nearly 3 months rest, can't train
