Biorythms - Do they work
Posted: 08 May 2019, 08:16
Not sure everyone on here will know what Biorythms are.
They are cycles your body goes through that dictate good and bad days in various areas with physical, emotional and intellectual been thought the main three.
Now this isn't black and white and scientists argue about it.
Its something I learned about when doing sports coaching and its use in individual sports (eg boxers deciding the best time to take a fight).
So thought I'd relate it to our players but only using the physical cycle which will be basis of strength and stamina (although other areas may dictate overall performance).
Remember with some players such as Kalvin the difference between a good and poor game may be 6/10 to 10/10. Where a Jack Harrison maybe 2/10 to 8/10 due to lack of consistency.
Take the Ipswich match the physical biorhythm indicated :-
Pontus & Dallas should have had good games.
Kalvin, Pablo, Roofe average games
Ayling and Klich poor games.
The rest average to low.
I stole 1964's match ratings which if you agree with them proves its not an exact science but is certainy in the right parish.
Ratings
1 Casilla
5 Ayling
5 Jansson
5 Cooper
6 Dallas
9 Phillips STAR MAN Mr Consistent as ever
5 Hernandez
4 Klich
3 Forshaw
2 Harrison
1 Roofe
Subs
4 Clarke
Remember i only used one particular biorythm and others may also have an effect.
They are cycles your body goes through that dictate good and bad days in various areas with physical, emotional and intellectual been thought the main three.
Now this isn't black and white and scientists argue about it.
Its something I learned about when doing sports coaching and its use in individual sports (eg boxers deciding the best time to take a fight).
So thought I'd relate it to our players but only using the physical cycle which will be basis of strength and stamina (although other areas may dictate overall performance).
Remember with some players such as Kalvin the difference between a good and poor game may be 6/10 to 10/10. Where a Jack Harrison maybe 2/10 to 8/10 due to lack of consistency.
Take the Ipswich match the physical biorhythm indicated :-
Pontus & Dallas should have had good games.
Kalvin, Pablo, Roofe average games
Ayling and Klich poor games.
The rest average to low.
I stole 1964's match ratings which if you agree with them proves its not an exact science but is certainy in the right parish.
Ratings
1 Casilla
5 Ayling
5 Jansson
5 Cooper
6 Dallas
9 Phillips STAR MAN Mr Consistent as ever
5 Hernandez
4 Klich
3 Forshaw
2 Harrison
1 Roofe
Subs
4 Clarke
Remember i only used one particular biorythm and others may also have an effect.