When we made our signings (Koch & Llorente) I'm sure it wasn't anticipated that both would get injured at the same time. Ayling, Struijk & Phillips are in real terms our 4th choice back up for CB.Barlow Boy wrote:Both bits came from the presser, in one breath MB saying Llorente is out for 2/3 weeks, and then went on to say they will be relying on Ayling, Pascal and Phillips to play back up. As you say, gaps appear elsewhere, presumably MB is happy with the replacements in those positions too.Leonickroberts wrote:I just don't understand how your two posts relate to each other BB. It's madness to only have 1 fit first choice CB and still not be looking to bring in backup. No doubting that Struijk, Phillips and Ayling can do a job there, but a) not to the same standard; and b) moving Ayling in or Phillips back leaves gaps elsewhere.
Would a top Prem standard CB come to play 4th choice in case others got injured?
What if neither had got injured?
Hindsight is a fantastic skill.
It's how it is we've not as many matches as those clubs in Europe to keep large squads happy (in fact less games than last season).
We know or should know by now that MB is a big believer in team/squad spirit and that is far easier to maintain with a smaller group. Injuries in the same position is always going to be an issue but it's a calculated gamble.
If you buy into MB's philosophy you buy into that.
As I said earlier bring someone in that would be happy been 4th choice and that wouldn't really be what we really need.