Enterprise Insurance issue winding up petition
- BigLeedsFan72
- Allan Clarke's tissue supplier
- Posts: 476
- Joined: 02 Aug 2013, 16:20
Re: Winding Up
Ah remember the good old days when we had stability under Mr Bates?? Sorry ONS couldn't help myself there.
"Be like water my friend" Bruce Lee
-
- LUFCTALK Moderator
- Posts: 894
- Joined: 16 Oct 2008, 18:59
Re: Winding Up
Could he have done this to give GFH the pretext to discontinue the sale process with Cellini? i.e. so GFH can say that now there is a winding up petition to contest they cannot continue with the whole thing.Mellor wrote:Ooh look, here we go
Version 1 removed to protect the innocent
Version 2 has now arrived. Who was it who said GFH would be better than Bates all those months ago
The winding up petition issued by Enterprise Insurance, a sponsor whose managing director, Andrew Flowers, claims to support the club, is misconceived and an abuse of legal process. It is being vigorously contested by the club's lawyers and there are no valid grounds to issue the petition.
Under the ownership of GFH Capital Leeds United has always met its financial obligations, and it will continue to do so
Please let it end.
There's a subtext to all this somewhere. What has been made public doesn't really add up.
- BigLeedsFan72
- Allan Clarke's tissue supplier
- Posts: 476
- Joined: 02 Aug 2013, 16:20
Re: Winding Up
It's like a bad episode of the X Files, one that doesn't seem to end.Ricardo Da Lepp wrote:Could he have done this to give GFH the pretext to discontinue the sale process with Cellini? i.e. so GFH can say that now there is a winding up petition to contest they cannot continue with the whole thing.Mellor wrote:Ooh look, here we go
Version 1 removed to protect the innocent
Version 2 has now arrived. Who was it who said GFH would be better than Bates all those months ago
The winding up petition issued by Enterprise Insurance, a sponsor whose managing director, Andrew Flowers, claims to support the club, is misconceived and an abuse of legal process. It is being vigorously contested by the club's lawyers and there are no valid grounds to issue the petition.
Under the ownership of GFH Capital Leeds United has always met its financial obligations, and it will continue to do so
Please let it end.
There's a subtext to all this somewhere. What has been made public doesn't really add up.
"Be like water my friend" Bruce Lee
Re: Winding Up
I call that dumping in your own back yard and where I grew up you just don't do that. I'm sure you're right about the motive, although I think it's to force GFHs hand rather than to assist them, but it's still a dirty trick which, for me at least, shows that Flowers is as unfit and improper as any of the bidders.Ricardo Da Lepp wrote:Could he have done this to give GFH the pretext to discontinue the sale process with Cellini? i.e. so GFH can say that now there is a winding up petition to contest they cannot continue with the whole thing.Mellor wrote:Ooh look, here we go
Version 1 removed to protect the innocent
Version 2 has now arrived. Who was it who said GFH would be better than Bates all those months ago
The winding up petition issued by Enterprise Insurance, a sponsor whose managing director, Andrew Flowers, claims to support the club, is misconceived and an abuse of legal process. It is being vigorously contested by the club's lawyers and there are no valid grounds to issue the petition.
Under the ownership of GFH Capital Leeds United has always met its financial obligations, and it will continue to do so
Please let it end.
There's a subtext to all this somewhere. What has been made public doesn't really add up.
We have 4 vital aways ahead. A football club should be focussing all it's energies on winning those games. Fail and we will be looking over our shoulder. Lufc of course has better things to do, as usual.
When I was young I said to my mum, 'are the hills in the distance America?'
attacco decente
attacco decente
-
- Neil Redfearn's diversity coach
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 31 Jan 2014, 21:10
Re: Winding Up
WITH ALL THE MAYHEM SURROUNDING LEEDS UTD, MULTI MILLION POUND LOSES, WINDING UP PETITIONS, THE SHARKS ARE CIRCLING TO GRAB THE REMNANTS OF OUR CLUB, WOULDN'T BE AT ALL SURPRISED IF ANOTHER ADMINISTRATION IS'NT FAR AWAY AND ANOTHER 10 YEARS WILL BE LOST.
Re: Enterprise Insurance issue winding up petition
Possible new front of the shirt sponsor?Help-Link @Help_LinkUK · 16m
Fantastic meeting at @LUFC - exciting news to come..... #lufc
"A man with new ideas is a madman. Until his ideas triumph."
Re: Enterprise Insurance issue winding up petition
I reckon this is purely to bugger up the Cellino deal. Enterprize can effectively be cheaper than Cellino now by waving the debt if they takeover and/or hinder the Cellino deal by having to add it as another debt Cellino will have to pay off.
Its just down to dirty tricks now. Honestly not sure who I want to take over the club now.
Its just down to dirty tricks now. Honestly not sure who I want to take over the club now.
Re: Enterprise Insurance issue winding up petition
Course it's to bugger up the Cellino deal, Sloopy, so that he can get his deal back in to the mix. That's how I see it any road. I think it's done for but I'm not surprised at the dirty tricks, which might be a bit inaccurate as he hasn't actually dirtied the club before has he? (I don't know most of the goings on so it's not an opinion).
But anyway, dirty tricks is for me better than what McDermott had to go through last week. As that great comment mentioned recently on here goes, 'You only get one chance to make a first impression', a genius comment.
But anyway, dirty tricks is for me better than what McDermott had to go through last week. As that great comment mentioned recently on here goes, 'You only get one chance to make a first impression', a genius comment.