Who should be backup striker in light of Bamford Injury?
-
- Jimmy Armfield's cardigan knitter
- Posts: 1203
- Joined: 18 May 2010, 08:36
Who should be backup striker in light of Bamford Injury?
As mentioned on other thread thought this could be an interesting poll!
- Selby White
- LUFCTALK Moderator
- Posts: 17206
- Joined: 25 Mar 2012, 11:32
Re: Who should be backup striker in light of Bamford Injury?
Let's hope Roofe stays fit, to me Roberts has not yet looked up to the job.
The other two look promising in the long term but striker is something history tells me we have always struggled to produce from the youth ranks.
Think you should have included Izzy Brown because think he would be a good possibility.
The other two look promising in the long term but striker is something history tells me we have always struggled to produce from the youth ranks.
Think you should have included Izzy Brown because think he would be a good possibility.
Keep your face always toward the sunshine - and shadows will fall behind you.
Re: Who should be backup striker in light of Bamford Injury?
I've gone for Roberts merely because he is the next senior player. He hasn't been given a proper run out because of his injury just after joining us in January, so far this season he hasn't played so much due to Roofe and Co being on fire.
Personally speaking i would like to see if Edmondson could get the breakthrough he deserves and Dalby also looks promising. We do need to nurture these younger talents more and break them in slowly rather than risk their careers by shoving them right into the deep end where they could as easily sink rather than swim.
Personally speaking i would like to see if Edmondson could get the breakthrough he deserves and Dalby also looks promising. We do need to nurture these younger talents more and break them in slowly rather than risk their careers by shoving them right into the deep end where they could as easily sink rather than swim.
-
- Arthur Fairclough's milliner
- Posts: 2368
- Joined: 11 Aug 2014, 16:33
Re: Who should be backup striker in light of Bamford Injury?
It is a set-back but I'm not overly worried about it tbh. Roofe very rarely gets injured. Biesla was happy with the amount of players at his disposal (senior squad along with some of the youngsters) so we could see Edmundson and Dalby amongst the subs in the near future, which is great. I'm gonna put this out there, I'm sure some of you may think I'm insane for mentioning this but I think Alioski could do a job up front with his tenacity and runs off the ball.
Re: Who should be backup striker in light of Bamford Injury?
Not a bad call Dom. Not bad at allDominanceUK wrote:...Alioski could do a job up front with his tenacity and runs off the ball.
"An astonishing number of people despise Leeds United or what Leeds United stand for. But this club was never made for them." - Phil Hay
Re: Who should be backup striker in light of Bamford Injury?
..Alioski could do a job up front with his tenacity and runs off the ball.
Was thinking the same before I read this
Was thinking the same before I read this
- Another Northern Soul
- LUFCTALK Moderator
- Posts: 7537
- Joined: 01 Nov 2015, 09:55
Re: Who should be backup striker in light of Bamford Injury?
Suddenly we're injury ravaged!
-
- LUFCTALK Moderator
- Posts: 894
- Joined: 16 Oct 2008, 18:59
Re: Who should be backup striker in light of Bamford Injury?
Klich seems to have an eye for goal this season, both at club and international level. Would he be worth a try in that position if we were stuck?
Re: Who should be backup striker in light of Bamford Injury?
I'll get me boots out of the shed. Let me at em, let me at em.
-
- Jimmy Armfield's cardigan knitter
- Posts: 1203
- Joined: 18 May 2010, 08:36
Re: Who should be backup striker in light of Bamford Injury?
Phil Hay has said there will be no free agent signing and that Bielsa will make do with he has got!